Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell Tickets in Birmingham, AL in Birmingham, Alabama For Sale

Luke Bryan Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell Tickets at Oak Mountain Amphitheatre - AL
in Birmingham, AL On July 23, xxxx
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Verizon Wireless Amphitheater - MO
Maryland Heights, MO
Friday
6/13/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Florida Country Superfest - 2 Day Pass: Jason Aldean, Luke Bryan, Eric Church, Miranda Lambert
EverBank Field (Formerly Jacksonville Municipal Stadium)
Jacksonville, FL
Saturday
6/14/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Florida Country Superfest: Luke Bryan, Miranda Lambert & Florida Georgia Line
EverBank Field (Formerly Jacksonville Municipal Stadium)
Jacksonville, FL
Sunday
6/15/xxxx
5:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
DTE Energy Music Theatre
Clarkston, MI
Wednesday
6/18/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
DTE Energy Music Theatre
Clarkston, MI
Thursday
6/19/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Heinz Field
Pittsburgh, PA
Saturday
6/21/xxxx
6:00 PM
View
Tickets
Summerfest: Luke Bryan
Marcus Amphitheater
Milwaukee, WI
Saturday
6/28/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Country Megaticket
Cruzan Amphitheatre (formerly Sound Advice Amphitheatre)
West Palm Beach, FL
Thursday
7/10/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan & Lee Brice
Jones County Fair
Monticello, IA
Friday
7/18/xxxx
8:00 PM
View
Tickets
Country Jam USA: Luke Bryan, Chris Young, Lee Brice & Dustin Lynch
Country Jam USA - WI
Eau Claire, WI
Saturday
7/19/xxxx
12:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Oak Mountain Amphitheatre - AL
Birmingham, AL
Wednesday
7/23/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Oak Mountain Amphitheatre - AL
Birmingham, AL
Thursday
7/24/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Aarons Amphitheatre At Lakewood (formerly Lakewood Amphitheatre)
Atlanta, GA
Friday
7/25/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Aarons Amphitheatre At Lakewood (formerly Lakewood Amphitheatre)
Atlanta, GA
Saturday
7/26/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Gillette Stadium
Foxborough, MA
Sunday
8/10/xxxx
6:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Lincoln Financial Field
Philadelphia, PA
Friday
8/15/xxxx
6:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Darien Lake Performing Arts Center
Darien Center, NY
Saturday
8/16/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Saratoga Performing Arts Center
Saratoga Springs, NY
Sunday
8/17/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Blossom Music Center
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Thursday
8/21/xxxx
8:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Blossom Music Center
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Friday
8/22/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Riverbend Music Center
Cincinnati, OH
Saturday
8/23/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Riverbend Music Center
Cincinnati, OH
Sunday
8/24/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Country Megaticket (All Remaining Shows)
Xfinity Theatre (formerly Comcast Theatre)
Hartford, CT
Friday
8/29/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Klipsch Music Center (Formerly Verizon Wireless Music Center - IN)
Noblesville, IN
Friday
8/29/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Klipsch Music Center (Formerly Verizon Wireless Music Center - IN)
Noblesville, IN
Saturday
8/30/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Soldier Field Stadium
Chicago, IL
Sunday
8/31/xxxx
6:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Verizon Wireless Arena - NH
Manchester, NH
Thursday
9/11/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Madison Square Garden
New York, NY
Friday
9/12/xxxx
7:30 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Xfinity Theatre (formerly Comcast Theatre)
Hartford, CT
Saturday
9/13/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Barclays Center
Brooklyn, NY
Sunday
9/14/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
AT&T Center
San Antonio, TX
Thursday
9/18/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
The Cynthia Woods Mitchell Pavilion
Spring, TX
Friday
9/19/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Gexa Energy Pavilion (Formerly Superpages.com Center)
Dallas, TX
Saturday
9/20/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
MidFlorida Credit Union Amphitheatre At The Florida State Fairgrounds (formerly Live Nation Amphitheatre)
Tampa, FL
Friday
9/26/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan
Cruzan Amphitheatre (formerly Sound Advice Amphitheatre)
West Palm Beach, FL
Saturday
9/27/xxxx
7:30 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Sleep Train Amphitheatre
Wheatland, CA
Thursday
10/16/xxxx
TBD
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Concord Pavilion (formerly Sleep Train Pavilion)
Concord, CA
Friday
10/17/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Shoreline Amphitheatre - CA
Mountain View, CA
Saturday
10/18/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Ak-Chin Pavilion (Formerly Desert Sky Pavilion)
Phoenix, AZ
Thursday
10/23/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Sleep Train Amphitheatre - Chula Vista (formerly Cricket Wireless Amphitheatre)
Chula Vista, CA
Friday
10/24/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Luke Bryan, Lee Brice & Cole Swindell
Hollywood Bowl
Los Angeles, CA
Saturday
10/25/xxxx
7:00 PM
View
Tickets
Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000 page requests per second, depending on time of day.[248] Page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Squid caching servers.[249] Further statistics, based on a publicly available 3-month Wikipedia access trace, are available.[250] Requests that cannot be served from the Squid cache are sent to load-balancing servers running the Linux Virtual Server software, which in turn pass the request to one of the Apache web servers for page rendering from the database. The web servers deliver pages as requested, performing page rendering for all the language editions of Wikipedia. To increase speed further, rendered pages are cached in a distributed memory cache until invalidated, allowing page rendering to be skipped entirely for most common page accesses.Wikipedia employed a single server until xxxx, when the server setup was expanded into a distributed multitier architecture. In January xxxx, the project ran on 39 dedicated servers in Florida. This configuration included a single master database server running MySQL, multiple slave database servers, 21 web servers running the Apache HTTP Server, and seven Squid cache servers. Wikipedia currently runs on dedicated clusters of Linux servers (mainly Ubuntu),[251][252] with a few OpenSolaris machines for ZFS. As of December xxxx, there were 300 in Florida and 44 in Amsterdam.[253] By January 22, xxxx, Wikipedia had migrated its primary data server to an Equinix facility in Ashburn, Virginia.[254][255]In accordance with growing amounts of incoming donations exceeding seven digits in xxxx as recently reported,[256] the Foundation has reached a threshold of assets which qualify its consideration under the principles of industrial organization economics indicating the need for the re-investment of donations into the internal research and development of the Foundation.[257] Two of the recent projects of such internal research and development have been the creation of a Visual Editor and a largely under-utilized "Thank" tab which were developed for the purpose of ameliorating issues of editor attrition, which have met with limited success.[245][258] The estimates for reinvestment by industrial organizations into internal research and development was studied by Adam Jaffe who recorded that the range of 4% to 25% annually was to be recommended, with high end technology requiring the higher level of support for internal reinvestment.[259] At the xxxx level of contributions for Wikimedia presently documented as 45 million dollars, the computed budget level recommended by Jaffe and Caballero for reinvestment concerning internal research and development is between 1.8 million and 11.3 million dollars annually.[259]According to the Michael Porter five forces analysis framework for industry analysis, Wikipedia and its parent institution Wikimedia are known as "first movers" and "radical innovators" in the services provided and supported by an open-source, on-line encyclopedia.[260] The "five forces" are centered around the issue of "competitive rivalry" within the encyclopedia industry where Wikipedia is seen as having redefined by its "radical innovation" the parameters of effectiveness applied to conventional encyclopedia publication. This is the first force of Porter's five forces analysis.[261] The second force is the "threat of new entrants" with competitive services and products possibly arising on the internet or the web. As a "first mover", Wikipedia has largely eluded the emergence of a fast second to challenge its radical innovation and its standing as the central provider of the services which it offers through the World Wide Web.[262] Porter's third force is the "threat of substitute products" and it is too early to identify Google's "Knowledge Graphs" as an effective competitor given the current dependence of "Knowledge Graphs" upon Wikipedia's free access to its open-source services.[260] The fourth force in the Porter five forces analysis is the "bargaining power of consumers" who use the services provided by Wikipedia, which has historically largely been nullified by the Wikipedia founding principle of an open invitation to expand and edit its content expressed in its moniker of being "the encyclopedia which anyone can edit."[261] The fifth force in the Porter five forces analysis is defined as the "bargaining power of suppliers" which is presently seen as the open domain of both the global internet as a whole and the resources of public libraries world-wide, and therefore it is not seen as a limiting factor in the immediate future of the further development of Wikipedia.[260]When the project was started in xxxx, all text in Wikipedia was covered by GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), a copyleft license permitting the redistribution, creation of derivative works, and commercial use of content while authors retain copyright of their work.[263] GFDL was created for software manuals that come with free software programs that are licensed under GPL. This made it a poor choice for a general reference work; for example, the GFDL requires the reprints of materials from Wikipedia to come with a full copy of the GFDL license text. In December xxxx, the Creative Commons license was released: it was specifically designed for creative works in general, not just for software manuals. The license gained popularity among bloggers and others distributing creative works on the Web. The Wikipedia project sought the switch to the Creative Commons.[264] Because the two licenses, GFDL and Creative Commons, were incompatible, in November xxxx, following the request of the project, the Free Software Foundation (FSF) released a new version of GFDL designed specifically to allow Wikipedia to relicense its content to CC BY-SA by August 1, xxxx. (A new version of GFDL automatically covers Wikipedia contents.) In April xxxx, Wikipedia and its sister projects held a community-wide referendum which decided the switch in June xxxx.[265][266][267][268]The handling of media files (e.g. image files) varies across language editions. Some language editions, such as the English Wikipedia, include non-free image files under fair use doctrine, while the others have opted not to, in part because of the lack of fair use doctrines in their home countries (e.g. in Japanese copyright law). Media files covered by free content licenses (e.g. Creative Commons' CC BY-SA) are shared across language editions via Wikimedia Commons repository, a project operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikipedia's accommodation of varying international copyright laws regarding images has led some to observe that its photographic coverage of topics lags behind the quality of the encyclopedic text.[269]The Wikimedia Foundation is not a licensor of content, but merely a hosting service for the contributors (and licensors) of the Wikipedia. This position has been successfully defended in court.[270][271]Websites ? Thousands of "mirror sites" exist that republish content from Wikipedia: two prominent ones, that also include content from other reference sources, are Reference.com and Answers.com. Another example is Wapedia, which began to display Wikipedia content in a mobile-device-friendly format before Wikipedia itself did.Compact discs, DVDs ? Collections of Wikipedia articles have been published on optical discs. An English version, xxxx Wikipedia CD Selection, contained about 2,000 articles.[273][274] The Polish-language version contains nearly 240,000 articles.[275] There are German- and Spanish-language versions as well.[276][277] Also, "Wikipedia for Schools", the Wikipedia series of CDs / DVDs produced by Wikipedians and SOS Children, is a free, hand-checked, non-commercial selection from Wikipedia targeted around the UK National Curriculum and intended to be useful for much of the English-speaking world.[278] The project is available online; an equivalent print encyclopedia would require roughly 20 volumes.Books ? There are efforts to put a select subset of Wikipedia's articles into printed book form.[279][280] Since xxxx, tens of thousands of print on demand books which reproduced English, German, Russian and French Wikipedia articles have been produced by the American company Books LLC and by three Mauritian subsidiaries of the German publisher VDM.[281]Semantic Web ? The website DBpedia, begun in xxxx, extracts data from the infoboxes and category declarations of the English-language Wikipedia. Wikimedia has created the Wikidata project with a similar objective of storing the basic facts from each page of wikipedia and the other WMF wikis and make it available in a queriable semantic format, RDF. This is still under development. As of Feb xxxx it has 15,000,000 items and 1,000 properties for describing them.Obtaining the full contents of Wikipedia for reuse presents challenges, since direct cloning via a web crawler is discouraged.[282] Wikipedia publishes "dumps" of its contents, but these are text-only; as of xxxx there is no dump available of Wikipedia's images.[283]Several languages of Wikipedia also maintain a reference desk, where volunteers answer questions from the general public. According to a study by Pnina Shachaf in the Journal of Documentation, the quality of the Wikipedia reference desk is comparable to a standard library reference desk, with an accuracy of 55%.[284]Wikipedia's original medium was for users to read and edit content using any standard web browser through a fixed Internet connection. Although Wikipedia content is now accessible through the mobile web since July xxxx, The New York Times on 9 February xxxx quoted Erik Moller, deputy director of the Wikimedia Foundation, stating that the transition of internet traffic from desktops to mobile devices was significant and a cause for concern and worry.[285] The The New York Times article reported the comparison statistics for mobile edits stating that, "Only 20 percent of the readership of the English-language Wikipedia comes via mobile devices, a figure substantially lower that the percentage of mobile traffic for other media sites, many of which approach 50 percent. And the shift to mobile editing has lagged even more."[285] The New York Times reports that Mr. Moller of Wikimedia has assigned "a team of 10 software developers focused on mobile," out of a total of approximately 200 employees working at the Wikimedia Foundation. One principal concern cited by The New York Times for the "worry" is for Wikipedia to effectively address attrition issues with the number of editors which the on-line encyclopedia attracts to edit and maintain its content in a mobile access environment.[285]Access to Wikipedia from mobile phones was possible as early as xxxx, through the Wireless Application Protocol (WAP), via the Wapedia service. In June xxxx Wikipedia launched en.mobile.wikipedia.org, an official website for wireless devices. In xxxx a newer mobile service was officially released,[286] located at en.m.wikipedia.org, which caters to more advanced mobile devices such as the iPhone, Android-based devices or WebOS-based devices. Several other methods of mobile access to Wikipedia have emerged. Many devices and applications optimise or enhance the display of Wikipedia content for mobile devices, while some also incorporate additional features such as use of Wikipedia metadata (See Wikipedia:Metadata), such as geoinformation.[287][288]Wikipedia is extremely popular. In February xxxx, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia is ranked fifth globally among all websites stating, "With 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month..., Wikipedia trails just Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft and Google, the largest with 1.2 billion unique visitors."[10]According to the "Wikipedia Readership Survey xxxx", the average Wikipedia reader is 36 years old, with a rough parity between genders. Almost half of Wikipedia readers visit the site more than five times a month, and a similar number of readers specifically look for Wikipedia in search engine results. Only about half of Wikipedia readers realize that Wikipedia is a non-profit.[290]Wikipedia has also spawned several sister projects, which are also wikis run by the Wikimedia Foundation, also called Wikimedia projects: "In Memoriam: September 11 Wiki",[291] created in October xxxx,[292] detailed the September 11 attacks; Wiktionary, a dictionary project, was launched in December xxxx;[293] Wikiquote, a collection of quotations, created a week after Wikimedia launched; and Wikibooks, a collection of collaboratively written free textbooks and annotated texts. Wikimedia has since started a number of other projects, including: Wikimedia Commons, a site devoted to free-knowledge multimedia; Wikinews, for citizen journalism; and Wikiversity, a project for the creation of free learning materials and the provision of online learning activities.[294] Of these, only Commons has had success comparable to that of Wikipedia. Another sister project of Wikipedia, Wikispecies, is a catalogue of species. In xxxx Wikivoyage, an editable travel guide, and Wikidata, an editable knowledge base, launched.The most obvious economic effect of Wikipedia has been the death of commercial encyclopedias, especially the printed versions, e.g. Encyclopaedia Britannica, which were unable to compete with a product that is essentially free.[295][296][297] Nicholas Carr wrote a xxxx essay, "The amorality of Web 2.0", that criticized websites with user-generated content, like Wikipedia, for possibly leading to professional (and, in his view, superior) content producers going out of business, because "free trumps quality all the time". Carr wrote: "Implicit in the ecstatic visions of Web 2.0 is the hegemony of the amateur. I for one can't imagine anything more frightening."[298] Others dispute the notion that Wikipedia, or similar efforts, will entirely displace traditional publications. For instance, Chris Anderson, the editor-in-chief of Wired Magazine, wrote in Nature that the "wisdom of crowds" approach of Wikipedia will not displace top scientific journals, with their rigorous peer review process.[299]There is also an ongoing debate about the influence of Wikipedia to the biography publishing business. "The worry is that, if you can get all that information from Wikipedia, what's left for biography?" Said Kathryn Hughes, professor of life writing at UEA and author of The Short Life and Long Times of Mrs Beeton and George Eliot: the Last Victorian.[300]In addition to logistic growth in the number of its articles,[301] Wikipedia has steadily gained status as a general reference website since its inception in xxxx.[302] According to Alexa and comScore, Wikipedia is among the ten most visited websites worldwide.[8][303] The growth of Wikipedia has been fueled by its dominant position in Google search results;[304] about 50% of search engine traffic to Wikipedia comes from Google,[305] a good portion of which is related to academic research.[306] The number of readers of Wikipedia worldwide reached 365 million at the end of xxxx.[307] The Pew Internet and American Life project found that one third of US Internet users consulted Wikipedia.[308] In xxxx Business Insider gave Wikipedia a valuation of $4 billion if it ran advertisements.[309]Wikipedia's content has also been used in academic studies, books, conferences, and court cases.[310][311][312] The Parliament of Canada's website refers to Wikipedia's article on same-sex marriage in the "related links" section of its "further reading" list for the Civil Marriage Act.[313] The encyclopedia's assertions are increasingly used as a source by organizations such as the US federal courts and the World Intellectual Property Organization[314] ? though mainly for supporting information rather than information decisive to a case.[315] Content appearing on Wikipedia has also been cited as a source and referenced in some US intelligence agency reports.[316] In December xxxx, the scientific journal RNA Biology launched a new section for descriptions of families of RNA molecules and requires authors who contribute to the section to also submit a draft article on the RNA family for publication in Wikipedia.[317]Wikipedia has also been used as a source in journalism,[318][319] often without attribution, and several reporters have been dismissed for plagiarizing from Wikipedia.[320][321][322]In July xxxx Wikipedia was the focus of a 30-minute documentary on BBC Radio 4[323] which argued that, with increased usage and awareness, the number of references to Wikipedia in popular culture is such that the word is one of a select band of 21st-century nouns that are so familiar (Google, Facebook, YouTube) that they no longer need explanation and are on a par with such 20th-century words as hoovering or Coca-Cola.On September 28, xxxx, Italian politician Franco Grillini raised a parliamentary question with the minister of cultural resources and activities about the necessity of freedom of panorama. He said that the lack of such freedom forced Wikipedia, "the seventh most consulted website", to forbid all images of modern Italian buildings and art, and claimed this was hugely damaging to tourist revenues.[324]On September 16, xxxx, The Washington Post reported that Wikipedia had become a focal point in the xxxx US election campaign, saying: "Type a candidate's name into Google, and among the first results is a Wikipedia page, making those entries arguably as important as any ad in defining a candidate. Already, the presidential entries are being edited, dissected and debated countless times each day."[325] An October xxxx Reuters article, titled "Wikipedia page the latest status symbol", reported the recent phenomenon of how having a Wikipedia article vindicates one's notability.[326]Wikipedia won two major awards in May xxxx.[328] The first was a Golden Nica for Digital Communities of the annual Prix Ars Electronica contest; this came with a ?10,000 (£6,588; $12,700) grant and an invitation to present at the PAE Cyberarts Festival in Austria later that year. The second was a Judges' Webby Award for the "community" category.[329] Wikipedia was also nominated for a "Best Practices" Webby award. On January 26, xxxx, Wikipedia was also awarded the fourth highest brand ranking by the readers of ?brandchannel.com?, receiving 15% of the votes in answer to the question "Which brand had the most impact on our lives in xxxx?"[330]Comedian Stephen Colbert has parodied or referenced Wikipedia on numerous episodes of his show The Colbert Report and coined the related term wikiality, meaning "together we can create a reality that we all agree on?the reality we just agreed on".[179] Another example can be found in a front-page article in The Onion in July xxxx, with the title "Wikipedia Celebrates 750 Years of American Independence".[332] "My Number One Doctor", a xxxx episode of the TV show Scrubs, played on the perception that Wikipedia is an unreliable reference tool with a scene in which Dr. Perry Cox reacts to a patient who says that a Wikipedia article indicates that the raw food diet reverses the effects of bone cancer by retorting that the same editor who wrote that article also wrote the Battlestar Galactica episode guide.[333]In xxxx, the comedic website CollegeHumor produced a video sketch named "Professor Wikipedia", in which the fictitious Professor Wikipedia instructs a class with a medley of unverifiable and occasionally absurd statements.[334]On August 23, xxxx, the New Yorker website published a cartoon with this caption: "Dammit, Manning, have you considered the pronoun war that this is going to start on your Wikipedia page?"[339]In computational linguistics, information retrieval and natural language processing, Wikipedia has seen widespread use as a corpus for linguistic research. In particular, it commonly serves as a target knowledge base for the entity linking problem, which is then called "wikification",[340] and to the related problem of word sense disambiguation.[341] Methods similar to wikification can in turn be used to find "missing" links in Wikipedia.[342]A number of interactive multimedia encyclopedias incorporating entries written by the public existed long before Wikipedia was founded. The first of these was the xxxx BBC Domesday Project, which included text (entered on BBC Micro computers) and photographs from over 1 million contributors in the UK, and covered the geography, art, and culture of the UK. This was the first interactive multimedia encyclopedia (and was also the first major multimedia document connected through internal links), with the majority of articles being accessible through an interactive map of the UK. The user interface and part of the content of the Domesday Project were emulated on a website until xxxx.[343]One of the most successful early online encyclopedias incorporating entries by the public was h2g2, which was created by Douglas Adams. The h2g2 encyclopedia is relatively light-hearted, focusing on articles which are both witty and informative. Everything2 was created in xxxx. All of these projects had similarities with Wikipedia, but were not wikis and neither gave full editorial privileges to public users.Other websites centered on collaborative knowledge base development have drawn inspiration from Wikipedia. Some, such as Susning.nu, Enciclopedia Libre, Hudong, and Baidu Baike likewise employ no formal review process, although some like Conservapedia are not as open. Others use more traditional peer review, such as Encyclopedia of Life and the online wiki encyclopedias Scholarpedia and Citizendium. The latter was started by Sanger in an attempt to create a reliable alternative to Wikipedia.[344][345] Scholarpedia also focuses on ensuring high quality.